Haybusa Parts and Service Member Support

Author Topic: Queston On Gen II Busa Fuelinjection  (Read 1713 times)

Offline $treetRacer

  • Restricted
  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
Queston On Gen II Busa Fuelinjection
« on: June 22, 2009, 05:42:10 PM »
Secondary throttle blades in or out? On a stocker or built either way? Anyone try this yet. Who's the Gen II authority?

Offline TurboGen2

  • Post Whore
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
  • Gender: Male
  • Molon Labe
Re: Queston On Gen II Busa Fuelinjection
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2009, 07:47:48 PM »
leave them in. controlls the a-b-c mode settings so your maps would be off not having them in
When injustice becomes law, Resistance becomes DUTY! -Thomas Jefferson

Offline PetriK

  • ECU Guru
  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1035
  • Gender: Male
  • Where am I?
Re: Queston On Gen II Busa Fuelinjection
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2009, 08:07:33 PM »

We tested gen2 and also some other bikes without, significant mid range loss, no top end gains. Leave in is better option.


Offline Yngve

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
  • Gender: Male
Re: Queston On Gen II Busa Fuelinjection
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2009, 11:12:23 PM »
Since I have started selling MOTTY AFR in Norway I have removed the secondary throttle blades from the following bikes: Hayabusa 08, B-King, Gsxr 1000 K3, z1000 and ZZR 1400 ( ZX14 ) and ALL have performed BETTER after we have removed the throtleblades.  When I view the logg I can see that the MOTTY has added up to 60 units of fuel ( out of around 160 ) in several places at low rews.

Without a MOTTY ( or a PCV ) its not easy to adjust the fueling so if you don't own a dynobench yourself you better leave it in.

I dont know what I am talking about but I do know that I am right :)