ALL UNREAD TOPICS
im 6ft 205 unsuited65 inches and 205 hp ive been 8.91 full street bike8.51 on a 50 shot at 166mph...2011 goal...7.99 full streetbike no turbo just a hit of nos and a good set of rods
boofoo and fatnslow you guys are about a hundred pounds or more than nykon and the bike aint gonna act the same for him as it does for you guys...fatnslow I think I have a set of stock pistons and if you need them to rebuild your motor you can have them...
fatnslow I have a set of stock pistons also if you need them let me know I can drop them off to Mr. Brad's shop are if you in the area you pick them up from me .
Finally this post is coming to life! Oh, and I would suggest 17/46 or 47 maybe if your not running a turbo..the turbo bike like some load on them, so that's why you can get away with the 44 or smaller rears.
Quote from: murderedout07 on December 14, 2010, 06:34:47 AMFinally this post is coming to life! Oh, and I would suggest 17/46 or 47 maybe if your not running a turbo..the turbo bike like some load on them, so that's why you can get away with the 44 or smaller rears. 16/42 would be like 17/44 correct? 17/46 seems pretty steep, but Ill try anything once.
My eight mile right now is about 5.50 i believe but ill.check when i get home,124-125 mph on motor
Quote from: nykon on December 14, 2010, 04:10:11 PMQuote from: murderedout07 on December 14, 2010, 06:34:47 AMFinally this post is coming to life! Oh, and I would suggest 17/46 or 47 maybe if your not running a turbo..the turbo bike like some load on them, so that's why you can get away with the 44 or smaller rears. 16/42 would be like 17/44 correct? 17/46 seems pretty steep, but Ill try anything once. yea their close, what gear are you going through the traps in? i think you might want to be in 6th. maybe somebody else will chime in on this
Quote from: fatnslow on December 14, 2010, 04:18:25 PMQuote from: nykon on December 14, 2010, 04:10:11 PMQuote from: murderedout07 on December 14, 2010, 06:34:47 AMFinally this post is coming to life! Oh, and I would suggest 17/46 or 47 maybe if your not running a turbo..the turbo bike like some load on them, so that's why you can get away with the 44 or smaller rears. 16/42 would be like 17/44 correct? 17/46 seems pretty steep, but Ill try anything once. yea their close, what gear are you going through the traps in? i think you might want to be in 6th. maybe somebody else will chime in on this yea you could try using some more gearing, its going to make it wheelie easier though but pull through the gears easier to as welli end up at about 10k rpm in 4th only at 134-136
great looking bike
my best was a 5.86@ 131mph an a 8.96 @ 162 with just an 6#of boost. not to bad with a crappy 1.60 sixty ft, weighing 350lbs unsuited at the time
Quote from: fatnslow on December 15, 2010, 04:18:32 PMmy best was a 5.86@ 131mph an a 8.96 @ 162 with just an 6#of boost. not to bad with a crappy 1.60 sixty ft, weighing 350lbs unsuited at the timeShit that's getting it done as well...I ain't never been in the 5's it was always something this worked but that broke and on and on...
Quote from: fatnslow on December 15, 2010, 04:18:32 PMmy best was a 5.86@ 131mph an a 8.96 @ 162 with just an 6#of boost. not to bad with a crappy 1.60 sixty ft, weighing 350lbs unsuited at the timeFuck dude, if I could ride like you id be running 7.999999 easy on my turd. Good job.
Quote from: murderedout07 on December 15, 2010, 04:34:56 PMQuote from: fatnslow on December 15, 2010, 04:18:32 PMmy best was a 5.86@ 131mph an a 8.96 @ 162 with just an 6#of boost. not to bad with a crappy 1.60 sixty ft, weighing 350lbs unsuited at the timeFuck dude, if I could ride like you id be running 7.999999 easy on my turd. Good job. thanks man. i hope to run alittle better for the new year. i feel i will need a multi stage clucth to help me. i have a single stage but i have tried everything i can with it. thanks again for the props