Haybusa Parts and Service Member Support

Author Topic: 200+ hp pump gas Gen II w/ no power adders and only OEM internal engine parts?  (Read 15036 times)

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
For a daily commuter, with occasional drag strip and/or Texas Mile type action:

What kind of horsepower gain is possible on a piped but otherwise stock pump gas Gen II, with all short Gixxer 1000 stacks, two properly degreed intake cams, and some additional compression (via milling or angle milling the head and/or pulling the base gasket)?

How much additional compression is even possible via these methods?  How much additional compression will be tolerated on pump gas on the quarter mile?  How much additional compression will be tolerated on pump gas for the Texas Mile?  What is the optimum compression ratio for two intake cams?  Where should they be degreed at?



-Kirk

Offline Texanzone

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1520
  • Gender: Male
  • Where am I?
 :bike:

Offline blk02ws6

  • Mad Post Whore
  • ******
  • Posts: 2373
  • Gender: Male
if your going to take the head off to be milled, why not have it ported also?

Offline sportbikeryder

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 7352
  • Gender: Male
if your going to take the head off to be milled, why not have it ported also?

 :tu:

If you want 200 hp, you're going to have to do some mods to make the torque move up.

Where are you located Kirk? West Coast I assume since you associate yourself with the likes of "Cookie". Reason I ask is there is a nice GEN2 for sale in Florida with lots of little tweaks.
Any day on a motorcycle like this that ends just needing parts and labor is a good day.
4.82, 158.67mph 1/8th mile 7.350, 200.32mph 1/4 mile Riding

4.392, 176.79mph 1/8th mile  6.610, 228.15mph 1/4 mile Tuning

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
if your going to take the head off to be milled, why not have it ported also?

'cause I don't generally trust anyone to do anything for me- I generally do all of my own stuff, and porting a Hayabusa cylinder head is beyond the scope of what I'm willing to do for a project like this.

That said, I appreciate the input, and I'm listening...  :wink:
-Kirk

Offline clearblue

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 279
  • Gender: Male
Kirk : you could put a set of 425/425 cams in it   :wink:

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
Kirk : you could put a set of 425/425 cams in it   :wink:
   :hys:


Thanks.  I'll keep that in mind.   :wink:
-Kirk

Offline YSI408

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Dont no what exhaust you have but mr-12 fuel brock pipe will get you in the 190 range..

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
Dont no what exhaust you have but mr-12 fuel brock pipe will get you in the 190 range..

Then an additional intake cam, all shorts, no balancer, and pulling the base gasket should get me over 200. 
-Kirk

Offline glenn71

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
  • Gen 1 stock length allmotor tragic
those gixxer stacks kill the torque for the sake of a bit better top end,try just 2 on the outside maybe.Whenever you skew a setup to acheive a magical peak number,often the bikes torque curve is highly compromised to acheive it.Midnight black got 200hp with a ported head and redialled cams on a gen2 motor.Average hp in the rpm range your most likely to use will acheive the best result.Id sooner ride a 190hp motor with a great spread of torque,than a 200hp motor with no nuts under 5500-6000.The 200hp motor will give a bigger adrenaline rush as it comes on cam,but if you did a rollon from 3000,youll be stairing at a tailight.
Gen1 the original and the best
8.76@165.42mph so far

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
I understand.  Having owned a Gen I Hayabusa, and then spending the last few years riding a black hole of torque (short stroke 5-valve R1) on the street, track, and drag strip, I feel I have some context here.  I'm not a street racer, and I suspect that there would still be enough low-rpm power to function in a satisfactory manner on the street, and yet have enough top end to put in a favorable performance at the occasional drag race, and to eventually try the Texas Mile.  No hard and fast decisions have been made, just kicking it around at this point.  Thanks for the input.  :)
-Kirk

Offline .D.

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 37

Offline midnight black man

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 278
  • Gender: Male
  • Where am I?
as glenn stated,torque is your main friend...don't go with the short stacks...it'll make a very nice hole near 8thou...

200 is easier now with ecu editor since you can tune everything,especially ignition down low...

http://www.suzukihayabusa.org/forum/index.php?topic=135228.msg1278514#msg1278514
frankly my dear,i don't give a damn...

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
Well, you guys certainly seem to know your stuff.  I did spend a butt-load of on my R1 ($2,000 titanium exhaust- to eliminate the OEM exhaust flapper valve, Power Commander, and mapping), to repair about a 20 horsepower hole in the powerband at about that same point (centered at about 7,500 rpm).

Maybe keep the stock stacks then.  How are you guys cutting the airbox? Is the Gen II airbox like the Gen I airbox inside?

I've done simple stuff like port matching, thinning down valve guides, removing air injection bumps, blending to remove the "step" at the valve seat, and polishing on piston engines, but any substantial deviations from the original port design would probably be beyond me.

I do have some reasonably successful (as defined by the 66 foot dyno at the end of the drag strip) experience with huge changes to the port design of rotary engines. I learned at a race car fabrication facility that had an engine dyno.  It was all done by setting the main port timing with a known template, drilling the auxilliary "bridge port" with a template, and then porting everything by hand, using my eye, a strong light, and only basic measuring.  No flow bench.  Mine worked about as well as anyone else's porting, but we're talking about two different animals here, and I don't want to screw it up.     



 
-Kirk

Offline 09GraySilverBusa

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
  • Gender: Male
The GenII airbox doesn't need cutting up. Throw a BMC Race air filter in and thats it.  I concure on the use of Short Stacks,  I only use them on my GENII for LSR and have a seperate ECU map tuned for it(at the track).
Brock's CT Exhaust, BMC Race Air Filter, ECU Editor, Custom Seat, Marchesini Rims w/Michelin Power Pures
TEXAS MILE (all stock motor)-March 2010, 195.4 MPH Pump Gas | Oct 2010, 197.2 | March 2011 197.3 | Oct 2011 196.4 | March 2012 197.8 | Oct 2012 206.1
LORING (stock motor) - July 2012 1-mile 205.48 & 1.5-mile 212.27

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
Understood.  Thanks.  :tu:
-Kirk

Offline glenn71

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
  • Gen 1 stock length allmotor tragic
i use the gixxer stacks on my stock length
1507  to kill the torque to make it easier to ride
and it helps hold the torque over 10k a bit better.
even with a 1507 at 670lbs its only just got
enough torque with those stacks.
Gen1 the original and the best
8.76@165.42mph so far

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
10-4.  The context here would be a 1340 with two intake cams and a CR in the general range of 13:1, at a total weight of about 725 pounds.  Most of the time, it would be RAISED 1.5" and wheelbase shortened to about 57.9".
-Kirk

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
Where would I set two intake cams at?
-Kirk

Offline 09GraySilverBusa

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
  • Gender: Male
Why Intakes? You will do better with 2 Exhaust cams. *(statement revised below)
« Last Edit: December 07, 2011, 01:06:39 PM by 09GraySilverBusa »
Brock's CT Exhaust, BMC Race Air Filter, ECU Editor, Custom Seat, Marchesini Rims w/Michelin Power Pures
TEXAS MILE (all stock motor)-March 2010, 195.4 MPH Pump Gas | Oct 2010, 197.2 | March 2011 197.3 | Oct 2011 196.4 | March 2012 197.8 | Oct 2012 206.1
LORING (stock motor) - July 2012 1-mile 205.48 & 1.5-mile 212.27

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
APE's tech page for the Gen II lists the inny as 281 degrees by .354" lift, and the outty as 266 degrees by .339" lift.

The Gen I inny is listed as 276 degrees by .347" lift and the outty as 259 degrees by .295" lift.   

I'm gonna assume (and I think I'm right about this), that the duration numbers are the total "advertised" numbers, with the actual duration at .050" proportionally less.

Sounded to me, that two Gen II intakes would work best.  But I'm listening.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2011, 05:26:09 PM by Kirk »
-Kirk

Offline glenn71

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
  • Gen 1 stock length allmotor tragic
just dial them up a bit higher like 106/108,wind the comp up,tidy up the head and ride the wheels off it.
Gen1 the original and the best
8.76@165.42mph so far

Offline midnight black man

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 278
  • Gender: Male
  • Where am I?
don't need to go extreme on the head...it's like throwing dice if you haven't done it before...5 ponies+ or - won't do much difference for the risk taken...do a good clean up and a blending,buy a couple of cam gears,and studs from jay ,a thin head gasket (would get you to true 12.5),stock cams dialed the way glenn said,tune it and be done with it...
frankly my dear,i don't give a damn...

Offline Kirk

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Universal Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 5685
10-4.  I understand that the CR numbers that Suzuki claims are "optimistic".
-Kirk

Offline 09GraySilverBusa

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
  • Gender: Male
APE's tech page for the Gen II lists the inny as 281 degrees by .354" lift, and the outty as 266 degrees by .339" lift.

The Gen I inny is listed as 276 degrees by .347" lift and the outty as 259 degrees by .295" lift.   

I'm gonna assume (and I think I'm right about this), that the duration numbers are the total "advertised" numbers, with the actual duration at .050" proportionally less.

Sounded to me, that two Gen II intakes would work best.  But I'm listening.
Pretty sure I'd read in a couple places where the spec's for the exhaust were better then the intake but after a bit of Googling I find that I'm mistaken. You are correct and I had it backwards  :duh:
Brock's CT Exhaust, BMC Race Air Filter, ECU Editor, Custom Seat, Marchesini Rims w/Michelin Power Pures
TEXAS MILE (all stock motor)-March 2010, 195.4 MPH Pump Gas | Oct 2010, 197.2 | March 2011 197.3 | Oct 2011 196.4 | March 2012 197.8 | Oct 2012 206.1
LORING (stock motor) - July 2012 1-mile 205.48 & 1.5-mile 212.27