Haybusa Parts and Service Member Support

Author Topic: 1 Mile Records,,  (Read 56350 times)

Offline osti33

  • Moderator
  • Post Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #50 on: January 03, 2014, 08:52:50 PM »
Oh, i just remembered this mentioned somewhere. But he got a unofficial time slip then ?

Colt's 230.446 @ the mile was timed and announced at the event.
BTW, Colt also ran 230.1xx the same day.
But like Fred says, some dumb ass never paid $100 to get the ticket.

I got the 230.446 from the event organizers who have it on their run log.
For me, that was proof enough he ran the speed.

For people who are collecting official record certificates, this "doesn't count", and I understand it.
For those speed enthusiasts who are looking to be "the fastest" it does count, and I understand it.

At first, I didn't add Colt's speed to the 200mph+ list, but several people explained to me why I should: "hell, he ran 230 twice, we all heard it..."

He absolutely deserves to be on the list! He ran the speed. Period!
It's in the event run logs. Right there in black and white.
2 Club member x 5
Bonneville, Loring, ECTA, Texas, Mojave

Offline entropy

  • Mad Post Whore
  • ******
  • Posts: 3128
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #51 on: January 03, 2014, 09:28:44 PM »
gentleman, all of the above, the present system is a mess, "It Needs Direction",, the way it is at the moment a record is only good for bragging rights at the local bar,,,

FlaminRoo,
You are absolutley correct, "only good for bragging rights at the local bar..."! :thumb:

But at this bar, you are not talking to a local squid, or a Harley guy who went 160mph on the interstate. 
You are talking to yr buds who also race LSR.  They know the impact of:
- head/tail wind,
- having a fat ass or being a jockey,
- good/poor technique,
- motor set up,
- aerodynamics,
and they know the top guys in their class, who their competition really is. 
The LSR enthusiasts are GREAT people, they don't always agree, but discussions are really fun. I love these people and those discussions. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Often wrong, but never unsure!!!!!

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #52 on: January 04, 2014, 12:28:00 AM »

You are left with:

Turbo, modified body.........= Bill Warner @ 296 MPH
Turbo, Stock Body..............=
NA, Nitrous modified body = Ransom Holbrook @ 238.6   WIL13
NA, gasoline, modified body = ????
NA, gasoline, stock body .....= ????
NA, Nitrous, stock body........ = ????

Might want to recheck your numbers.

Deans 269 wasnt in 1-mile so it would be Billy, Shane or Tom next for 1-mile speed...
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #53 on: January 04, 2014, 12:34:34 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

As Karl has pointed out, her bikes engine is completely stock and unoppened.

I think more than a few people were impressed with its performance!
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!

Offline speedduck

  • Post Whore
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #54 on: January 04, 2014, 03:22:03 AM »
Oh, i just remembered this mentioned somewhere. But he got a unofficial time slip then ?

Colt's 230.446 @ the mile was timed and announced at the event.
BTW, Colt also ran 230.1xx the same day.
But like Fred says, some dumb ass never paid $100 to get the ticket.

I got the 230.446 from the event organizers who have it on their run log.
For me, that was proof enough he ran the speed.

For people who are collecting official record certificates, this "doesn't count", and I understand it.
For those speed enthusiasts who are looking to be "the fastest" it does count, and I understand it.

At first, I didn't add Colt's speed to the 200mph+ list, but several people explained to me why I should: "hell, he ran 230 twice, we all heard it..."

He absolutely deserves to be on the list! He ran the speed. Period!
It's in the event run logs. Right there in black and white.
Definitely, that counts for me. And even though my speed on the list is higher, it`s done with turbobusa, i`m more of a n/a guy and the 230.1 is the one to beat. I`m not saying, i could.
Can you pull a top5 or top8 n/a from the overall listing ?

Offline FlaminRoo

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 252
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #55 on: January 04, 2014, 04:25:34 AM »
gentleman, all of the above, the present system is a mess, "It Needs Direction",, the way it is at the moment a record is only good for bragging rights at the local bar,,,

FlaminRoo,
You are absolutley correct, "only good for bragging rights at the local bar..."! :thumb:

But at this bar, you are not talking to a local squid, or a Harley guy who went 160mph on the interstate. 
You are talking to yr buds who also race LSR.  They know the impact of:
- head/tail wind,
- having a fat ass or being a jockey,
- good/poor technique,
- motor set up,
- aerodynamics,
and they know the top guys in their class, who their competition really is. 
The LSR enthusiasts are GREAT people, they don't always agree, but discussions are really fun. I love these people and those discussions. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:

yup,yup,, such is the discussion after any "local" event, be it lsr, dragracing, motocross, whatever,, however i can go to Bonneville and be part of a conversation with "anyone" from "any" country about landspeed on the salt, why ?, because its out there where everyone can access whats happening, its administed by basicaly one orginisation, thay have control of its destinay, :D,
 ummmm 1mile events, what you talkin 'bout boy, theres even decent/confusion in this thread, :?, theres a big wide world out there for the 1mile events, :bike:

Entropy, end of chain buddy,  :wink: :thumb:
« Last Edit: January 04, 2014, 04:54:08 AM by FlaminRoo »
First Australian to ride a motorcycle 200mph at Bonneville,,

Offline SEJ

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Rider
  • **********
  • Posts: 398
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #56 on: January 04, 2014, 08:58:00 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

As Karl has pointed out, her bikes engine is completely stock and unoppened.

I think more than a few people were impressed with its performance!

The fastest that I personally have seen her go on that bike is 198-199 mph. So I assumed the jump to 212 was the result of opening the motor and the big tail wind...

So count me in as one of the "impressed"!
222.66 MPH at the Ohio Mile
201.52 MPH in the 1/2 Mile
12 lbs. boost
01' Turbo GSX-R 1000

Offline scott g

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #57 on: January 04, 2014, 09:32:18 AM »

You are left with:

Turbo, modified body.........= Bill Warner @ 296 MPH
Turbo, Stock Body..............=
NA, Nitrous modified body = Ransom Holbrook @ 238.6   WIL13
NA, gasoline, modified body = ????
NA, gasoline, stock body .....= ????
NA, Nitrous, stock body........ = ????

Might want to recheck your numbers.

Deans 269 wasnt in 1-mile so it would be Billy, Shane or Tom next for 1-mile speed...

Josh:

Which of your three candidates
used a Stock Body ?

Offline Warp12

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #58 on: January 04, 2014, 09:39:17 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

As Karl has pointed out, her bikes engine is completely stock and unoppened.

I think more than a few people were impressed with its performance!

The fastest that I personally have seen her go on that bike is 198-199 mph. So I assumed the jump to 212 was the result of opening the motor and the big tail wind...

So count me in as one of the "impressed"!

I don't think motor mods would be required, considering the winds:



No doubt that little bike was flying that day!! That is the luck of the draw in LSR....some days you have the wind in your face...some days at your back! Almost all of us prefer the latter!  :)

Shane

Offline scott g

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #59 on: January 04, 2014, 09:45:00 AM »
I would like to schedule a
6:00 AM start time, please........

Offline SEJ

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Rider
  • **********
  • Posts: 398
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #60 on: January 04, 2014, 09:58:48 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

As Karl has pointed out, her bikes engine is completely stock and unoppened.

I think more than a few people were impressed with its performance!

The fastest that I personally have seen her go on that bike is 198-199 mph. So I assumed the jump to 212 was the result of opening the motor and the big tail wind...

So count me in as one of the "impressed"!

I don't think motor mods would be required, considering the winds:



No doubt that little bike was flying that day!! That is the luck of the draw in LSR....some days you have the wind in your face...some days at your back! Almost all of us prefer the latter!  :)

Shane

So those are the actual wind conditions on the day she ran 212?
222.66 MPH at the Ohio Mile
201.52 MPH in the 1/2 Mile
12 lbs. boost
01' Turbo GSX-R 1000

Offline Warp12

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #61 on: January 04, 2014, 10:06:15 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

As Karl has pointed out, her bikes engine is completely stock and unoppened.

I think more than a few people were impressed with its performance!

The fastest that I personally have seen her go on that bike is 198-199 mph. So I assumed the jump to 212 was the result of opening the motor and the big tail wind...

So count me in as one of the "impressed"!

I don't think motor mods would be required, considering the winds:



No doubt that little bike was flying that day!! That is the luck of the draw in LSR....some days you have the wind in your face...some days at your back! Almost all of us prefer the latter!  :)

Shane

So those are the actual wind conditions on the day she ran 212?

Those were measured conditions in Beeville that day. It is easy to look up the weather history. It can sometimes be very enlightening (or misleading?). I think when you consider a stock motor BMW going +10 mph over what Jockeys have done on them in the past, it is not hard to tell which way the wind was blowing that day! :)

Shane

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #62 on: January 04, 2014, 10:14:47 AM »

You are left with:

Turbo, modified body.........= Bill Warner @ 296 MPH
Turbo, Stock Body..............=
NA, Nitrous modified body = Ransom Holbrook @ 238.6   WIL13
NA, gasoline, modified body = ????
NA, gasoline, stock body .....= ????
NA, Nitrous, stock body........ = ????

Might want to recheck your numbers.

Deans 269 wasnt in 1-mile so it would be Billy, Shane or Tom next for 1-mile speed...

Josh:

Which of your three candidates
used a Stock Body ?

Your bike wasn't stock body or a 1-mile speed but by your definition it would either be Shane or Charlie next..
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!

Offline scott g

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #63 on: January 04, 2014, 10:46:26 AM »

Your bike wasn't stock body
or a 1-mile speed but by your definition it
would either be Shane or Charlie next..


Which of my bikes are you thinking of ?

1)  The bike that Shane Stubbs rode 264.375 mph at Maxton ?

2)  The bike that Shane Stubbs rode 259.9 mph at Goliad ?

Offline osti33

  • Moderator
  • Post Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #64 on: January 04, 2014, 01:24:56 PM »
Oh, i just remembered this mentioned somewhere. But he got a unofficial time slip then ?

Colt's 230.446 @ the mile was timed and announced at the event.
BTW, Colt also ran 230.1xx the same day.
But like Fred says, some dumb ass never paid $100 to get the ticket.

I got the 230.446 from the event organizers who have it on their run log.
For me, that was proof enough he ran the speed.

For people who are collecting official record certificates, this "doesn't count", and I understand it.
For those speed enthusiasts who are looking to be "the fastest" it does count, and I understand it.

At first, I didn't add Colt's speed to the 200mph+ list, but several people explained to me why I should: "hell, he ran 230 twice, we all heard it..."

He absolutely deserves to be on the list! He ran the speed. Period!
It's in the event run logs. Right there in black and white.
Definitely, that counts for me. And even though my speed on the list is higher, it`s done with turbobusa, i`m more of a n/a guy and the 230.1 is the one to beat. I`m not saying, i could.
Can you pull a top5 or top8 n/a from the overall listing ?

I think a top 5 NA list would look like this. Colt is fastest at 230.446. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
Ryan

39   Colt "TinTin" Bateman   230.446   LOR12   ****FASTEST NA****
42.1   Jennifer Robertson (9secondJen)      229.963   LOR13   ****FASTEST NA W/TICKET****
49   Ryan Ostergard (osti33)   228.9   BEE13   
51   Zach Millholland (madkawboy)   227.34   WIL12   
        Mark DeLuca                             227.2   Maxton   (His turbo speed is faster so his NA isn't on the list)

That's why the list is so complicated. Mark is a perfect example. His NA speed would be in the top 5 but it's not even on the list because his turbo speed is faster.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2014, 04:36:27 PM by osti33 »
2 Club member x 5
Bonneville, Loring, ECTA, Texas, Mojave

Offline Team Millholland

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #65 on: January 04, 2014, 05:52:20 PM »
Seems the above 4 n/a positions have a common denominator!

What about Dean's n/a pass at Wilmington before his get-off?

No doubt about Colt's one mile passes at Loring being "official", he was hauling the mail all week-end.

Dan
« Last Edit: January 04, 2014, 05:54:07 PM by Team Millholland »

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2014, 06:01:00 PM »

Your bike wasn't stock body
or a 1-mile speed but by your definition it
would either be Shane or Charlie next..


Which of my bikes are you thinking of ?

1)  The bike that Shane Stubbs rode 264.375 mph at Maxton ?

2)  The bike that Shane Stubbs rode 259.9 mph at Goliad ?

None, I would say Charlies bike "before" you bought it for the stock fairing record..


Seems the above 4 n/a positions have a common denominator!

What about Dean's n/a pass at Wilmington before his get-off?

No doubt about Colt's one mile passes at Loring being "official", he was hauling the mail all week-end.

Dan

That was discussed but rumor was Keith or the ECTA doesn't count it because he went off the end of the track.  They claimed if you crash at Bonneville the record doesn't count so the 1-Mile speed didn't count either... :(
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #67 on: January 04, 2014, 06:02:35 PM »
Maybe they should add a rule that the registered owner/rider is the only record that counts, no jockeys allowed...  :hys:
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!

Offline scott g

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #68 on: January 04, 2014, 08:56:45 PM »

Your bike wasn't stock body
or a 1-mile speed but by your definition
it would either be Shane or Charlie next..


What bike was Shane riding, where,
when and what speed ?

Offline hayaboosta

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Gender: Male
  • Heads Up Performance
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #69 on: January 05, 2014, 08:00:53 AM »

Don't kid yourself. That BMW meets the "stock appearing" rules. Probably a fully blue printed engine, no base gasket, thinner head gasket, degreed cams, race ecu, ceramic bearings, etc. Not to mention that it comes with a factory quick shifter. I don't know what the "big tail wind" was, but it makes a substantial difference!

I ran 208.3 into a 13 mph head wind last September. Can anyone give me an idea what that would be in static conditions?

"Valarie Thompson's 1000cc BMW has never had the head off, either before the 2013 Texas Mile or since".  I got that from a 110% unimpeachable source.
For comparison, she ran a 202 or some such number at Bonneville in 2013.
BTW: i was at that 2013 Texas event and seem to remember her running 212 twice, but can't swear to it.

For me, this shows:
1. how important a strong tailwind can be,
2. how important it is to go to every event you can, the one you miss will be the one with a big tail wind,
3. how difficult it is compare LSR speeds apple to apples, especially wrt head/tail winds

Your 208 into a head wind is fukken awesome.
A head wind can add mile-for-mile, or just a little bit depending on the strength & direction and persistance of the wind over the entire track. 
For my Busas, I recorded wind strength & direction at the starting line on every pass.  My asphalt Busa was sooo predictable I could usually predict trap speed within 1-2 mph just by looking at the TFA flag on my trailer.

Valarie's 212 didn't surprise me, but I was happy as hell for her, knowing that it would provoke bench racing discussions (like this one) for a long time :bike:

In 2013 Valerie ran over 200 several times and as fast as 203+ at Bonneville, 210 at the Mojave Magnum in a BIG crosswind, NOT a tailwind and an epic 199.9 on her 2nd full run in crappy conditions at El Mirage (2nd fastest female m/c run next to Susan Robertson on a turbo Busa at 205).   The Bonneville runs were on spec fuel, I could make more HP with pump gas and the other events were on MR12.  I can assure you the engine has yet to be opened, hell the plugs were never removed since installed at the factory until late Sept!  While she did run two 212's at Beeville with the aid of some Texas HP (tailwind for those who have neve been) I find the other runs of '13 very impressive.  Valerie is a hell of a rider on a bike that flat gets it done in the HP department. 
Bonneville  200 MPH Club Naked    AMA/Bub    201 MPH Club
El Mirage   200 MPH Club Naked    Texas         200 MPH Club
Maxton      200 MPH Club Naked   
Loring        200 MPH Club Naked   
Mojave       200 MPH Club Naked  Best 246 Naked 240 Clothed

Offline entropy

  • Mad Post Whore
  • ******
  • Posts: 3128
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #70 on: January 05, 2014, 08:09:10 AM »
Scott,
do you know the exact speed Valerie's two 212.x's were?

I'd like to know both of the numbers

thanks, Karl
Often wrong, but never unsure!!!!!

Offline JHerheim

  • Mad Post Whore
  • ******
  • Posts: 2432
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #71 on: January 05, 2014, 08:16:08 AM »
Just to throw in my confusion on SG's  "Stock" body claim.   

I remember Charlies bikes having the Ram Air holes covered when he was riding it, as well as taped seams.   Is that a still stock body?  I purchased a ram air delete nose (turbo upper) years ago and just assumed that was no longer "stock" when I got it.  When we start swapping and modifying fuel tanks,  is it still stock?   Seems to be just a small step away from saying you have a stock engine because you choose to use an otherwise OEM piston cooler jet within. 

Offline hayaboosta

  • Rider
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Gender: Male
  • Heads Up Performance
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #72 on: January 05, 2014, 08:38:38 AM »
Karl, They were both 212.00
Bonneville  200 MPH Club Naked    AMA/Bub    201 MPH Club
El Mirage   200 MPH Club Naked    Texas         200 MPH Club
Maxton      200 MPH Club Naked   
Loring        200 MPH Club Naked   
Mojave       200 MPH Club Naked  Best 246 Naked 240 Clothed

Offline scott g

  • Post Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #73 on: January 05, 2014, 08:59:13 AM »
Just to throw in my confusion on SG's  "Stock" body claim.   

I remember Charlies bikes having the Ram Air holes covered when he was riding it, as well as taped seams.   Is that a still stock body?  I purchased a ram air delete nose (turbo upper) years ago and just assumed that was no longer "stock" when I got it.  When we start swapping and modifying fuel tanks,  is it still stock?   Seems to be just a small step away from saying you have a stock engine because you choose to use an otherwise OEM piston cooler jet within.

The description of "stock body" seems poorly defined !

1)  Is a different tail a problem ?
2)  Is a cut-down tank not a "stock body" item ?
3) Is the "Intake delete" a disqualifier ?
4) Is taping seams a knockout?

The most obvious "body condition" seems to be "Naked,"
where NO aero aids are allowed, and Bill Warner was
 the acknowledged master of that class.

"Stock Body" definition needs some work.
(Maybe "lifting" language from "Production" might help)

"Modified body" (As in Bill Warner's 278 MPH body)
likewise needs better language, especially
to differentiate if from "New body" - like Bill's 311 bike.

And, of course, there is "Full streamlining," where a racer
could do anything, like the Ill-fated Noonan bike at Mojave.

That's five (5) "aero classes."

NA and Blown = 2 aspired classes.

Gasoline, and Nitrous, nitro, E85, Methanol, C16 = 2 classes.

Engines of 1000, 1350, and 2000cc = 3 classes.

5 x 2 x 2 x 3 = 60 classes.......

Offline Got-Busa?

  • OFF TOPIC
  • Mad Post Whore
  • **********
  • Posts: 3023
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1 Mile Records,,
« Reply #74 on: January 05, 2014, 09:08:21 AM »
Just to throw in my confusion on SG's  "Stock" body claim.   

I remember Charlies bikes having the Ram Air holes covered when he was riding it, as well as taped seams.   Is that a still stock body?  I purchased a ram air delete nose (turbo upper) years ago and just assumed that was no longer "stock" when I got it.  When we start swapping and modifying fuel tanks,  is it still stock?   Seems to be just a small step away from saying you have a stock engine because you choose to use an otherwise OEM piston cooler jet within. 

I was just poking fun at Scott but you are correct.  However, I consider Charlies more stock because his was just taped where SG bikes had plates drilled and screwed and an extended tail on occasion. It shouldn't even be up for discussion if he wasn't riding either..
« Last Edit: January 05, 2014, 09:09:57 AM by Got-Busa? »
CLICK-->  *Got-Busa's "STREET BIKE"-project* <--CLICK
"WILMINGTON MILE" - 212.7 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 1/2 MILE" - 202.566 MPH!
"ARKANSAS 2KM" 232.919 MPH!
THANK YOU SHANE STUBBS @ STPI
"TEXAS MILE" -182.265 MPH stock --204.468 MPH "Brock's Performance" basic mods -- 227.2 MPH "RCC TURBO" low boost/half naked!