Bikes have a great coefficient of drag at low speeds because of their lower frontal area. But at higher speeds, most cars can gain an advantage. I mean that difference was not very big: .3. Superior torque (very superior) and less drag is certainly enough to make a difference at those high speeds. A Viper is not stellar for aero drag, but it is significantly better than a bike at high speeds. This is the reason F1 cars acceleration hits an absolute brick wall around 200. At that point, with their big wings, they are reported to have a 1.0 or higher drag coefficient. Air resistance is not linear. Also why Top Fuel dragsters cannot beat their weaker rocket powered brethren for trap speeds; because by the end of the run, it takes 2-3000 HP just to drag that wing through the air.
Quit being such a dick to that guy. Gary said he was really believed he could win and was a great sport about losing. Just because he is not on a forum doesn't mean he cannot ride. I hope Gary's friend shows one of your "supported" riders what is going on. Why must he tuck at 70 mph, because if he doesn't, the 5 Ibs of pressure on him will hold the bike back. Is he bad because he didn't look like he was twisting the throttle off the bike. He looked relaxed and smooth, exactly what makes a rider fast. Look at Shumacher- he never looks like he is breaking a sweat. He obviously did not lift during shifts, which you guys always bitch about. Are you mad because he did not pop a huge wheelie to look like he was insanely fast. You cannot dispute that Gary pulled on him like crazy when he was full throttle- the most unskilled part of the race. Just quit being such a hater- embrace your biker brethren.