also, why do I have to be biased?
I am just saying it how it is, the 14 has 7 yrs on the busa and all they have to show for the technological growth is dual balancers, and last years FI system?
if Kawasaki wanted to impress someone or have the bike of the year why couldn't they fit a 1352 into a 52.5" wheelbase and trim the weight to about 420, then they could say they have something? why couldn't it look like the zx6 or the zx10? its hideous and you know it, WTF is with all the headlights anyways? yamaha has the headlight thing covered? and the tail? the cowl that goes over the one peice seat?
I just don't see what all the hype is about? a 1400 with 170 hp to the ground, thats about right. should we have a parade and hire some strippers when it rolls into town? go ahead, I am not impressed with anything about the bike, nothing, zilch, nadda, null, it just doesn't impress me, does that make me biased?
sheeez scotty, what kind of world do you live in? am I wrong about my opinion of the 10 as well? am I wrong about kawasaki dealing with the geometry of the 10? am I wrong about them making the power more linear and useable on the 10?
I think kawasaki has short changed its customers, if they want to say they replaced the 12 with the 14 and modified its looks and thats about it fine, I can accept that, but this bike WILL not change the sportbiking world, the drag racing world perhaps but not the sportbiking...
it is what it is....