Author Topic: FAST BIKES - JULY 2003!!! (Read 17179 times) Tweet

Todd · « **Reply #25 on:** July 10, 2003, 05:53:00 PM »

Thanks Voices UK!! Much appreciated.

As usual we have to either read the article ourselves or find someone honest before we really know what it's about. FK knows I have to ride 200 miles round trip to get that mag and he hopes I won't so he can write his own article.

So it seems the only reason they didn't pick the Busa is because of the brakes! This coming from one of the only mags in the world ever to test a 12 (non-restricted) as faster against a borrowed and wrecked Busa.

At least they found a proper Busa to test this time it seems? Let me get this straight: They tested top speed on 2 RESTRICTED bikes?! What kind of nonsense is that other than to prove the Busa's restrictor (may it be damned to hell) works BETTER than the 12's?!

And the pathetic sheep shagger is hanging his hat on that?!

Desperation makes people do strange things.

And another myth to debunk:

quote:
I guess it wouldn't affect a thing if you had heard that Suzuki is Motorcyclist's biggest advertiser either. It works both ways.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

it might if it were true , but according to them it isnt .

I would say the latest August 2003 issue in my hand speaks for itself:

THERE ARE EXACTLY ZERO ADVERTISEMENTS FROM SUZUKI!

Don't be fooled - that's just one of the endless excuses on a mile long list used by 12 owners trying to explain away the latest test results. With so many results all the same, they've had to become creative!

Baaahahahahahahah!

Todd · « **Reply #26 on:** July 10, 2003, 06:06:00 PM »

Here's the one's I can remember even though they are so forgettable:

Bad clutch
too much oil
not enough oil
not broken in
bad rider (Gadson bad?!)
headwind for the 12
tailwind for the Busa
mag is paid by Suzuki
mag wasn't paid enough by Kaw
Busa was a ringer [never mind the dyno results]
Busa was broken in and the 12 wasn't
Bad timing lights/equipment/radar
gearing was changed on the 12
gearing was changed on the Busa
Bad rear tire for the 12
Bad road/test location
12 was restricted (2000 year model)
Busa was not restricted (any year model that wins)

I've heard so many - all of these and more from Jamie alone - I can't even begin to remember them all!

VegasDude · « **Reply #28 on:** July 10, 2003, 06:43:00 PM »

FK, please go to the record book and look and see who is the fastest. A far as fastbike magazine goes, I don't subcribe to it but if they put the 12 on top then that's ok by me. The 12 needs some positive results, but for my money it's the busa.........................!!

MADMAN · « **Reply #29 on:** July 10, 2003, 07:23:00 PM »

the UK magazines are the only ones that seem to favor the 12 over the BUSA most of the time.i wonder if it's because they are afraid to really get on the busa, what with all of that power and all.lol.i've had both a BUSA and 12.i actually had a 99 busa,then an 02 12 and now i'm back to the BUSA(02).the 12 doesn't even compare.of cous=rse it's all a matter of opinion and that's my.02.good day mates

ZEUS · « **Reply #30 on:** July 10, 2003, 08:04:00 PM »

Now didn't a professional rider ride both these bikes receintly in front of reps from both companies and didn't those companies send mechs, and techs, and management to oversee all adjustments and repairs to ensure that their bike was running at peak performance as well as make sure each other played fair and stuck to the rules and who won. The BUSA' the same bike that has won since day one, the busa was not designed or claimed to come out and out run the zx12, it just does. (and everything else) Now remember the zx12 was supposed to be the one to out run the Busa, ever since the zx12 came on the scene it just doesn't.

Kirk · « **Reply #31 on:** July 10, 2003, 08:11:00 PM »

You know, it's Jamie's pre-occupation with canine male genital functions that makes this such an ugly subject.

VegasDude · « **Reply #32 on:** July 10, 2003, 08:11:00 PM »

FK, thanks for the personal recognition. Er, geeze........what is a kilt?

Steve A · « **Reply #33 on:** July 10, 2003, 08:25:00 PM »

Sort of a Mini-skirt for boys. You have, no doubt, heard the phrase "Let it all hang out"!!!

02SE · « **Reply #36 on:** July 11, 2003, 12:45:00 AM »

Not all the UK mags prefer the 12

superbike magazine August 2002, they unanimously preferred the busa.

performance bikes magazine february 2003, they unanimously preferred the busa.

As far as fast bikes magazine goes, their ability to ride is questionable. I was looking through the june issue the other day, the test of the liter class sportbikes, the quarter mile time for the '03 gsxr1000 was something like 10.7 seconds @ 133mph. The rest were even slower, obviously their testers are pathetically unskilled. So their opinion on anything doesn't mean much to me. So there you have it jamie, the one magazine in the world that picked the 12 is comprised of incompetent rider's. Have a nice day.

Uglyoldrider · « **Reply #38 on:** July 11, 2003, 04:07:00 AM »

Well, I 'spose that does make a lot of sense. Is he like that on the 12 boards?

MADMAN · « **Reply #39 on:** July 11, 2003, 08:48:00 PM »

Todd · « **Reply #40 on:** July 11, 2003, 09:28:00 PM »

Welcome Back!!!

Looks like Jamie dropped another turd bomb and ran off again.

Come back mini skirt wearing Dog Wanker!! We're not done with you yet. Don't make me go to the UK board to drag you back!

BAhahahahahah!!

rat · « **Reply #41 on:** July 11, 2003, 09:55:00 PM »

Coldstone your killing me that shit is to funny.

Does F.K stand for fucking kid

Todd · « **Reply #44 on:** July 11, 2003, 11:57:00 PM »

But you have to admit - he is good at what he does!

Hell he's been with us so long now, he's just like a member of the family. A member you keep locked in the closet and never speak about!

Bahahahaha!

TECH · « **Reply #45 on:** July 12, 2003, 11:29:00 PM »

Someone's got to try and keep Kawasaki afloat! Seems to me that Kawi is behind the times as far as sportbikes go. Anybody heard of a merger of some sort......I wonder why?

FK · « **Reply #46 on:** July 12, 2003, 08:18:00 PM »

Only you cunting fucks of existence could turn a sore defeat into some sort of deluded victory....ooooh, it beat the 12 in the 6th gear roll on!!!

Take a cunting look dog dick slurpers....the gruntmeister was actually the ZZR!!!!

You really do need to get the surgical procedure known as rectum cranium removium!!!

FK

Todd · « **Reply #47 on:** July 12, 2003, 11:34:00 PM »

So you are declaring victory as the fastest RESTRICTED bike oh slobbering skirt boy?!!

ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!

60-120 3.79 the Hayabusa trounces the zx at 4.56

0-150 11,62 the Busa romps and stomps all over the poor ZX-12S for slow at 12.76 [OVER A FULL SECOND] And a small note the Busa takes 24.94 sec to get to its top speed while the zx takes 28.04 sec.

Sore defeat?! 6th gear roll on from ZERO MPH?!

ANSWER THE QUESTION!

You happily accept the results of this test brought to us by YOU which means the Busa's restrictor is SUPERIOR to the 12's and the Busa completely TROUNCES the 12 from 0 to infinity and beyond?!

ANSWER THE QUESTION! - WE'RE WAITING!

Signed:
Your friend on the fastest and quickest non restricted bike in the world,

Baaahahahahahaha!!!!

jrrendon · « **Reply #48 on:** July 12, 2003, 11:41:00 PM »

Who let the gimp back out.

Superbike · « **Reply #49 on:** July 13, 2003, 12:13:00 AM »

Went to barnes & nobel then to borders books and both Fast Bikes Mags had nothing on any busa or 12, what gives?
What does the cover look like on this issue?

News:

Author Topic: FAST BIKES - JULY 2003!!! (Read 17179 times) Tweet

rat