You guys really are a bunch of farting vaginas aren't you.
Pharrp phaaarrrrp pharp pharp phaaaarrrrrpppppp.
Thats all i ever hear from this board.
You cite the roll on data as some sort of a win when all that cunting tells you is the differences in gearing and torque. That is why we cunting have gears ya fuckwits.
HORSE power is what counts in acceleration and to get the best horsepower, you use the gears. But you don't understand that concept do yeez? The only thing you understand about HORSE power is how quickly they can pump their male milk into yer gaping holes! Which are perpetually open while you spout...we are the fastest we are the fastest...Guinessth thsaid thso!!!
Buncha hemorrhoids on the butt-rim of existence and that is the truth.
As for the 0-150 data it doesn't make sense for it to be over a second of a gap if they were using their gears properly, PARFUCKINGTICULARILY IF THE 12 HAD THE FASTER 1/4 TIME AND SPEED AT 140+ So in a few mph, it lost over a second to the busa yet was ahead at 140 in the 1/4. They must have been short shifting or something to test torque as any bastard 12 takes a flash to get from 140+ to 150 and its at that point the 12s usually piss on the Busa with their top end power advantage.
At Elvington i typically make about 3 to 4 bike lengths on the lumping fuck fuglies at that point in a race so it's not telling us anything other than a gear determined roll on and the fact that you sad willycheese munching fucks are that desperate that you totally forgot...WHICH WAS THE FASTEST, WHICH WAS THE QUICKEST AND WHICH BASTARD BIKE WON THE CUNTING TEST!
Now fuck, right, off!
FK